JV abroad:
strategy and the numbers
- Build a growth strategy around a JV: country, model and partner
- Model the economics before the MoU: unit cost, each side's contribution, revenue, taxes and fees
- Set up a structure that keeps the IP with the Ukrainian company
- Take the deal through Resolution 875 permits to the first production run
The problem
The MoU gets signed before anyone models the economics.
Wiseboard Defense tracks 51 outbound production deals by Ukrainian defense companies. 41 of them were announced in 2026, and 6 are in serial production. KSE Institute counts 22% of partnerships stalled, most of them at the MoU stage.
The country, the structure, the permit path and the unit cost are usually worked out after the public announcement, when the terms are hard to change. Modelling them before signing turns the MoU into a launch plan.
The service
What the work covers
and country
- Goal: market access, funding or capacity
- Two or three countries compared on the same numbers
- Model: joint company, assembly at a partner's line, or a subsidiary
- Drone Deal and MFA country-list check
economics
- Unit cost on the new site
- Each side's contribution and stake
- Revenue: royalties or dividends
- Tax on taking profit out and the Resolution 875 fee
and structure
- Partner search and selection for the country and model
- Capital checks on both sides
- Jurisdiction, shareholders, technology licence
- IP access limits and an exit scenario
and launch
- Resolution 875 application and Ministry of Defence sign-off
- A counterpart request from the partner country's ministry
- A National Bank capital permit, where needed
- Site financing and the first order
Scope
From where the deal is now to the first run
Pick the stage your deal is at. The bench shows what is still ahead and what you get at the end.
Scope and timing for your deal are set at the first review.
Models
Which JV model fits which goal
A joint company in the partner's country
Both sides are shareholders. The company takes a production licence and sells to the local customer or supplies Ukraine.
The most common model. The jurisdiction follows the customer and the investors.Assembly at a partner's line
The partner has the production line; the Ukrainian side hands over the specification, documentation and software. No joint company is required.
The fastest start. The technology transfer still needs a permit.A subsidiary with the partner in the capital
Control stays with the Ukrainian side; the partner comes in with money, space or access to the customer.
The most control. And the most own capital up front.Process
Roadmap to the first production run
Stages overlap: the partner search runs alongside the modelling, and the counterpart request is prepared together with the application. A deal that already has an MoU starts mid-map.
- The product and its current unit cost
- The countries you are considering
- The partner's offer or the MoU, if there is one
- The current company structure and who holds the IP
- Investors and round terms, if the JV has to sit in the model
- A contact person on the company side
Deliverable
Strategy, numbers and deal structure
You come out with a decision to negotiate on: which country, which model, what the product will cost on the new site, and who earns what.
- A JV-led growth strategy
- Countries and models compared on the same numbers
- Unit cost on the new site
- Each side's contribution and stake
- Revenue mechanism: royalties or dividends
- Tax on taking profit out and the Resolution 875 fee
- Deal structure and IP licence terms
- Permit and launch roadmap
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Next step
Want the JV for your new country modelled?
Build a growth strategy around a JV and model its economics: unit cost, each side's contribution, revenue, taxes and fees. Sign up.
Thank you
We have your request. The team will be in touch shortly to find a time to talk.